California

OnlyFans, Crypto, and Tax Evasion: New Federal Cases in California

May 03, 2026 by Anastasiia Ponomarova in California  Case Studies  Sex Crime  
Thumbnail for: OnlyFans, Crypto, and Tax Evasion: New Federal Cases in California

Federal Crackdown on Digital Income: Understanding Tax Compliance for Content Creators and Cryptocurrency Users in California

The digital economy has transformed how individuals generate income, creating unprecedented opportunities through subscription platforms and virtual currency exchanges. However, this evolution has also attracted heightened scrutiny from federal authorities. Recent enforcement actions in California demonstrate that the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Justice are intensifying their focus on individuals who fail to properly report earnings from online content creation and cryptocurrency transactions. Understanding your obligations under federal tax law is essential for anyone earning income through these modern channels, and recognizing when you need specialized legal representation can make the difference between resolving issues administratively and facing criminal prosecution.

The landscape of digital income taxation has become increasingly complex as platforms proliferate and transaction volumes grow. Content creators on subscription-based services and individuals trading virtual currencies often underestimate their reporting requirements or misunderstand the tax implications of their activities. Federal authorities have developed sophisticated methods for identifying unreported income, and they are pursuing cases with significant resources and determination. If you find yourself facing questions about your tax filings related to digital income, consulting with an experienced attorney who understands both the technical aspects of these cases and the human impact of federal investigations is crucial for protecting your rights and your future.

The Evolving Federal Enforcement Landscape

Recent High-Profile Cases Signal Increased Scrutiny

Federal prosecutors in California have recently brought charges against individuals whose income streams reflect the modern digital economy. These cases demonstrate that authorities are actively monitoring platforms where substantial income changes hands, from subscription-based content services to cryptocurrency exchanges. The charges filed in these matters include filing false returns, failing to pay assessed taxes, and in some instances, more serious allegations involving the movement of funds derived from various sources. The common thread connecting these prosecutions is the government’s allegation that individuals knowingly failed to comply with their tax obligations despite earning substantial sums through digital channels.

One recent indictment in the Tampa division of Florida’s federal court charged a content creator with filing a false return for one tax year and failing to pay taxes for four subsequent years. According to the charging document, the individual earned more than five million dollars through a subscription platform over a five-year period but allegedly failed to pay approximately 1.6 million dollars in assessed taxes. This case illustrates the substantial financial stakes involved and the serious criminal exposure that can result from alleged non-compliance. The charges carry potential prison time that could extend for years, demonstrating that federal authorities view these matters as serious criminal conduct rather than mere civil tax disputes.

Another significant case involved an early adopter of virtual currency who renounced his citizenship and relocated to a jurisdiction known for favorable tax treatment. Federal authorities alleged that this individual provided inaccurate information when filing required exit tax returns, significantly undervaluing his holdings and failing to disclose substantial cryptocurrency positions. When he later sold virtual currency for approximately 240 million dollars in cash, authorities claimed this taxable event went unreported, leaving nearly 48 million dollars in unpaid obligations. After an international arrest and extensive legal proceedings, the matter resolved through a deferred prosecution agreement requiring payment of the full alleged tax liability. These cases send a clear message that federal prosecutors are committed to pursuing tax compliance in the digital economy with the same vigor they apply to traditional income sources.

Understanding the IRS Criminal Investigation Process

The Internal Revenue Service maintains a specialized division dedicated to investigating potential criminal violations of tax law. IRS Criminal Investigation employs special agents who possess unique federal jurisdiction over tax-related offenses and maintain an exceptionally high conviction rate in cases they bring to prosecution. These investigators use sophisticated analytical tools to identify patterns suggesting unreported income, including data from third-party payment processors, platform operators, and financial institutions. When IRS-CI initiates an investigation, it typically means they have already identified substantial evidence of potential violations and are building a case for criminal prosecution rather than civil resolution.

The investigation process often begins quietly, with agents gathering records and conducting interviews with third parties before approaching the target of the investigation. By the time an individual learns they are under criminal investigation, authorities may have already assembled significant evidence. This reality makes early legal intervention critical. An experienced attorney can sometimes identify an investigation in its early stages and take proactive steps to address issues before charges are filed. In other situations, legal counsel can negotiate with prosecutors to resolve matters through civil channels or reach agreements that avoid the most serious consequences. Understanding that you are not required to speak with investigators without legal representation present is essential for protecting your rights during this process.

Federal tax investigations can extend over months or even years as authorities meticulously document income, trace funds, and build their case. During this period, individuals may be unaware they are under scrutiny, continuing patterns of behavior that could strengthen the government’s case. Once charges are filed, the matter enters the criminal justice system with all its attendant consequences, including potential incarceration, substantial fines, and lasting impacts on professional licenses and personal reputation. The stakes in these cases cannot be overstated, making it essential to work with legal counsel who understands both the technical tax issues and the criminal defense strategies necessary to achieve the best possible outcome.

Tax Obligations for Content Creators on Subscription Platforms

Understanding Your Reporting Requirements

Individuals who create content on subscription-based platforms often enter this work without fully understanding their tax obligations. Unlike traditional employment where employers withhold taxes and issue W-2 forms, content creators typically operate as independent contractors or self-employed individuals. This status creates specific reporting requirements that differ significantly from traditional employment. Platform operators generally issue Form 1099-NEC to creators who earn more than $600 in a calendar year, reporting this income to both the creator and the IRS. This form documents non-employee compensation and triggers reporting obligations for the recipient.

Beyond the 1099-NEC, creators who receive payments through third-party processors like payment apps or card networks may also receive Form 1099-K, which reports gross payment transactions. Understanding which forms you should expect and what they represent is fundamental to proper tax compliance. The income reported on these forms must be included on your tax return, typically on Schedule C if you are operating as a sole proprietor. This schedule requires you to report gross income and allows you to deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses, resulting in net income subject to both income tax and self-employment tax. The self-employment tax component often surprises new content creators, as it represents both the employer and employee portions of Social Security and Medicare taxes, currently totaling 15.3% of net earnings.

Failing to report income documented on information returns creates a clear paper trail that IRS systems can easily detect. Automated matching programs compare information returns filed by payers against income reported on individual tax returns. When discrepancies appear, the IRS generates notices requesting explanation or additional payment. Ignoring these notices or failing to respond appropriately can escalate a simple reporting error into a more serious matter. In cases where the unreported income is substantial and the failure to report appears intentional, the matter may be referred to IRS Criminal Investigation for potential prosecution. Working with a knowledgeable professional who understands these requirements can help you establish proper reporting systems from the outset, avoiding problems before they develop.

The Distinction Between Hobby and Business Income

One critical determination for content creators involves whether their activity constitutes a business or a hobby under tax law. This distinction carries significant implications for your ability to deduct expenses and your overall tax liability. The IRS applies several factors to make this determination, including whether you operate in a businesslike manner, maintain accurate records, devote substantial time to the activity, and have a reasonable expectation of profit. The agency also considers whether the activity has been profitable in three of the last five years, though this is not an absolute requirement. If your content creation qualifies as a business, you can deduct ordinary and necessary expenses on Schedule C, reducing your taxable income.

Ordinary and necessary expenses for content creators might include equipment purchases like cameras, lighting, and microphones, software subscriptions, internet costs, and even specific clothing or props used exclusively for content creation. The key is that these expenses must be directly related to producing income and must be reasonable in amount. Maintaining detailed records of these expenses, including receipts and documentation of their business purpose, is essential for substantiating deductions if questioned. If the IRS determines your activity is a hobby rather than a business, you lose the ability to deduct expenses against the income, meaning you must pay tax on gross receipts without any offset for costs incurred. This can result in a substantially higher tax liability and creates a strong incentive to ensure your activity qualifies as a business.

The hobby loss rules exist to prevent individuals from deducting expenses from activities they pursue primarily for personal enjoyment rather than profit. However, many content creators genuinely operate businesses with profit motives, even if they also enjoy the work. Documenting your business intent through formal business structures, separate bank accounts, marketing efforts, and professional record-keeping strengthens your position that the activity is indeed a business. An attorney experienced in tax matters can help you structure your content creation activities to clearly demonstrate business intent and ensure you maintain the documentation necessary to support this classification. This proactive approach not only maximizes your legitimate deductions but also provides strong evidence of good faith compliance if questions arise.

Cryptocurrency Tax Compliance and Common Pitfalls

Reporting Requirements for Virtual Currency Transactions

Virtual currency transactions create complex tax obligations that many individuals fail to fully understand or properly report. The IRS treats cryptocurrency as property for tax purposes, meaning that each transaction potentially triggers a taxable event. When you sell cryptocurrency for cash, trade one cryptocurrency for another, or use cryptocurrency to purchase goods or services, you must calculate and report any gain or loss on the transaction. This requirement applies regardless of the transaction amount, though practical enforcement focuses on substantial transactions. The calculation requires determining your basis in the cryptocurrency (typically what you paid for it) and comparing it to the fair market value at the time of the transaction, with the difference representing taxable gain or deductible loss.

The complexity multiplies when individuals engage in frequent trading or hold cryptocurrency across multiple platforms and wallets. Each trade between different cryptocurrencies constitutes a taxable event, requiring calculation of gain or loss at the time of the exchange. Many traders fail to maintain adequate records of these transactions, making it difficult or impossible to accurately calculate their tax liability. Some individuals mistakenly believe that cryptocurrency transactions are anonymous or untraceable, leading them to conclude that reporting is optional. This belief is dangerously incorrect. Cryptocurrency exchanges operating in the United States are required to report certain transactions to the IRS, and the agency has developed sophisticated tools for tracing cryptocurrency movements across blockchain networks.

Recent enforcement actions demonstrate that the IRS is actively pursuing individuals who fail to report cryptocurrency gains. The agency has issued thousands of warning letters to taxpayers it believes may have unreported cryptocurrency income, and it has obtained court orders requiring major exchanges to provide customer transaction data. If you have engaged in cryptocurrency transactions without properly reporting them, you may face not only back taxes and penalties but also potential criminal prosecution if the IRS determines your failure to report was willful. Consulting with legal counsel experienced in cryptocurrency tax issues can help you understand your obligations, correct past errors through voluntary disclosure programs when appropriate, and establish proper reporting systems going forward.

Special Considerations for Expatriation and Exit Taxes

Individuals who renounce their U.S. citizenship or terminate their long-term resident status face special tax rules designed to ensure they pay tax on unrealized gains before leaving the U.S. tax system. These expatriation rules require covered expatriates to file final tax returns that include a mark-to-market calculation treating all property as if it were sold on the day before expatriation. This deemed sale can trigger substantial tax liability on appreciated assets, including cryptocurrency holdings. The exit tax applies to the extent that net unrealized gains exceed a threshold amount that adjusts annually for inflation. For individuals with substantial cryptocurrency holdings that have appreciated significantly, the exit tax can represent a major financial obligation.

Accurately valuing cryptocurrency holdings for exit tax purposes requires careful analysis and documentation. Unlike publicly traded securities with readily available pricing, some cryptocurrencies trade on limited exchanges or have volatile pricing that can vary significantly across platforms. Providing inaccurate valuations on exit tax returns, whether through intentional understatement or negligent preparation, can result in serious consequences. Federal authorities have prosecuted individuals who allegedly provided false information to tax preparers, resulting in substantially understated exit tax liabilities. Even if the understatement results from misunderstanding rather than intentional fraud, the consequences can be severe, including criminal charges, substantial penalties, and international arrest warrants.

The case of the early cryptocurrency adopter who faced federal charges after expatriation illustrates these risks. Authorities alleged he provided inaccurate information about his holdings when preparing exit tax returns, resulting in significant undervaluation. When he later sold cryptocurrency for hundreds of millions of dollars, the transaction should have been reported under expatriation rules, but authorities claimed it went unreported. The resolution required payment of the full alleged tax liability, demonstrating that even wealthy individuals with resources for sophisticated tax planning face serious consequences for alleged non-compliance. If you are considering expatriation and hold significant cryptocurrency or other appreciated assets, working with experienced legal and tax professionals is essential for ensuring accurate compliance with these complex rules.

Platform Operator Obligations and Enforcement Actions

When Platforms Become Targets of Federal Investigation

Recent enforcement actions have targeted not just individual taxpayers but also the platforms that facilitate digital transactions. Federal authorities have brought charges against virtual currency trading platforms for allegedly failing to implement required anti-money laundering controls and knowingly facilitating illegal transactions. These cases demonstrate that platform operators face substantial legal obligations beyond simply providing a marketplace for transactions. The Bank Secrecy Act requires money transmitting businesses to implement effective anti-money laundering programs, verify customer identities, and report suspicious activities to federal authorities. Platforms that fail to meet these obligations face potential criminal prosecution, substantial fines, and operational restrictions.

One significant case involved a peer-to-peer virtual currency platform that allegedly marketed itself as a service that did not require customer identification and did not enforce anti-money laundering policies. Federal prosecutors claimed the platform knowingly facilitated transactions for customers engaged in fraud, illegal commercial activities, and other criminal conduct. The platform allegedly processed billions of dollars in transactions over several years, collecting tens of millions in revenue while failing to file required suspicious activity reports despite knowing that users were engaged in illegal activities. The company ultimately pleaded guilty to multiple federal charges and agreed to pay millions in criminal penalties, though the amount was reduced based on the company’s claimed inability to pay the full amount calculated under sentencing guidelines.

These platform-level prosecutions create additional risks for individual users. When federal authorities investigate a platform, they typically obtain extensive transaction records that can reveal individual users’ activities. If these records show substantial transactions that should have been reported on tax returns but were not, individual users may face their own investigations and potential charges. The fact that a platform failed to implement proper controls does not excuse individual users from their tax reporting obligations. Understanding that your transactions on any platform create records that federal authorities can access is essential for making informed decisions about tax compliance. If you have used platforms that are now under federal investigation, consulting with legal counsel about your potential exposure and options for addressing any reporting deficiencies is crucial.

Coordinated Enforcement Across Federal Agencies

Tax enforcement in the digital economy often involves coordination among multiple federal agencies. The Department of Justice’s Criminal Division works closely with IRS Criminal Investigation, but cases may also involve the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Homeland Security Investigations, and other agencies depending on the specific allegations. This coordinated approach allows authorities to pursue cases from multiple angles, potentially bringing charges under various federal statutes beyond tax law. For example, the platform case mentioned earlier included charges for violating the Travel Act by promoting illegal activities through interstate commerce, operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, and conspiring to violate Bank Secrecy Act requirements in addition to tax-related charges.

This multi-agency approach means that individuals facing tax investigations may also face scrutiny for related conduct. If authorities believe you used digital platforms to facilitate other illegal activities, or if they suspect money laundering or other financial crimes, the investigation may expand beyond simple tax non-compliance. The penalties for these additional charges can be substantial, and the complexity of defending against multiple allegations requires experienced legal counsel who understands both tax law and broader criminal defense strategies. The coordinated nature of these investigations also means that information you provide to one agency may be shared with others, making it essential to have legal representation before engaging with any federal investigators.

The resolution of the platform case included coordination with FinCEN for parallel civil enforcement, demonstrating how criminal and civil authorities work together to address alleged violations. This coordination can result in substantial financial penalties beyond criminal fines, including civil money penalties and restitution requirements. For individuals, this means that resolving a tax investigation may require addressing both criminal exposure and civil tax liabilities, potentially involving negotiations with multiple government entities. An experienced attorney can navigate these parallel proceedings, working to achieve a comprehensive resolution that addresses all aspects of your potential liability while protecting your rights throughout the process.

Building a Strong Defense Strategy

Early Intervention and Voluntary Disclosure

When facing potential tax issues related to digital income, the timing of your response can significantly impact the outcome. If you recognize that you have unreported income or unfiled returns before the IRS contacts you, voluntary disclosure programs may offer a path to resolve the matter civilly rather than criminally. The IRS offers several voluntary disclosure options that allow taxpayers to come forward, file accurate returns, and pay taxes owed along with penalties and interest. While these programs do not guarantee immunity from prosecution, they significantly reduce the likelihood of criminal charges when properly utilized. The key is making the disclosure before the IRS has initiated an investigation, as voluntary disclosure options generally close once authorities have already identified the issue.

Working with an experienced attorney to navigate voluntary disclosure is essential because the process requires careful preparation and strategic decision-making. Your attorney can help you gather necessary records, calculate accurate tax liabilities, and prepare comprehensive disclosures that demonstrate good faith cooperation. The disclosure must be complete and accurate, as providing false or misleading information during the voluntary disclosure process can actually worsen your situation. An attorney can also communicate with the IRS on your behalf, protecting your rights while demonstrating your commitment to resolving the matter. In some cases, voluntary disclosure can result in civil resolution with penalties and interest but no criminal prosecution, allowing you to move forward without the life-altering consequences of a criminal conviction.

Even if you have already been contacted by the IRS or other federal authorities, early legal intervention remains crucial. An experienced attorney can assess the strength of the government’s case, identify potential defenses, and negotiate with prosecutors to achieve the best possible outcome. In some situations, this may involve demonstrating that errors were the result of misunderstanding rather than willful evasion, or showing that the government’s calculations of tax liability are incorrect. In other cases, cooperation with the investigation and acceptance of responsibility may lead to reduced charges or favorable plea agreements. The specific strategy depends on the facts of your case, but having skilled legal representation from the earliest stages of an investigation provides the best opportunity for a favorable resolution.

Challenging the Government’s Case

When criminal tax charges are filed, the government must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, a high standard that requires strong evidence of willful violation. Tax crimes generally require proof that the defendant knew of the legal duty to file returns or pay taxes and voluntarily and intentionally violated that duty. Mere negligence or misunderstanding of complex tax rules typically does not constitute criminal conduct. An experienced defense attorney can challenge the government’s evidence on multiple fronts, potentially creating reasonable doubt about whether the alleged conduct was truly willful. This might involve demonstrating that you relied on professional advice, that you lacked the sophistication to understand complex reporting requirements, or that errors resulted from good faith misunderstanding rather than intentional evasion.

In cryptocurrency cases, challenging the government’s valuation of assets and calculation of gains can be a critical defense strategy. Cryptocurrency valuation can be complex, particularly for assets that trade on limited exchanges or have volatile pricing. If the government’s calculations rely on questionable valuation methods or fail to properly account for basis, an experienced attorney can present alternative calculations that may significantly reduce the alleged tax liability. Similarly, in cases involving content creation income, challenging the classification of expenses or the determination of whether activity constitutes a business versus a hobby can impact the ultimate tax calculation. Reducing the alleged tax loss can affect both the potential criminal penalties and the civil tax liability you ultimately face.

Procedural defenses may also be available depending on how the investigation was conducted. If authorities obtained evidence through improper means, violated your constitutional rights, or failed to follow required procedures, your attorney may be able to suppress evidence or challenge the charges on procedural grounds. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination. If investigators violated these protections during their investigation, the evidence they obtained may be inadmissible in court. An attorney experienced in federal criminal defense understands how to identify these issues and raise them effectively, potentially weakening the government’s case or even resulting in dismissal of charges.

The Path Forward: Protecting Your Rights and Your Future

Why Specialized Legal Representation Matters

Tax cases involving digital income require attorneys who understand both the technical aspects of tax law and the unique characteristics of digital platforms and cryptocurrency. The intersection of tax compliance, criminal defense, and emerging financial technologies creates complexity that general practice attorneys may not be equipped to handle. When selecting legal representation for these matters, look for attorneys with specific experience in federal tax defense, cryptocurrency issues, and white-collar criminal defense. This specialized knowledge allows your attorney to identify defenses and strategies that might not be apparent to someone without this background, potentially making the difference between conviction and acquittal, or between criminal prosecution and civil resolution.

The stakes in federal tax cases are simply too high to proceed without experienced legal counsel. A conviction for tax crimes can result in years of imprisonment, substantial fines, restitution requirements, and supervised release conditions that restrict your activities for years after any prison sentence is completed. Beyond the direct criminal penalties, a tax conviction can destroy professional licenses, damage your reputation, and create obstacles to employment and business opportunities for the rest of your life. The collateral consequences of a federal conviction extend far beyond the courtroom, affecting nearly every aspect of your personal and professional life. Investing in quality legal representation is not an expense but rather an essential investment in protecting your future.

An experienced attorney provides more than just legal knowledge; they offer guidance through one of the most stressful experiences you may ever face. Federal investigations and prosecutions can extend over months or years, creating enormous anxiety and uncertainty. Having an attorney who communicates clearly, explains your options, and provides realistic assessments of your situation can help you make informed decisions and maintain perspective during this difficult time. Your attorney serves as your advocate, protecting your rights at every stage of the process and working tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome. This relationship is built on trust and communication, making it essential to find an attorney with whom you feel comfortable and confident.

Taking Action to Protect Yourself

If you have earned income through content creation platforms or cryptocurrency transactions and have concerns about your tax compliance, taking action now can prevent serious problems in the future. Begin by gathering records of all your digital income, including information returns from platforms, transaction records from cryptocurrency exchanges, and documentation of any business expenses you have incurred. Review your past tax returns to determine whether you have accurately reported all income and properly claimed allowable deductions. If you identify potential issues, consult with an experienced attorney before taking any further action. Your attorney can assess your situation, explain your options, and help you develop a strategy for addressing any compliance issues.

For content creators who are just beginning to earn income through digital platforms, establishing proper systems from the outset can prevent problems before they develop. This includes setting up separate business bank accounts, maintaining detailed records of income and expenses, making quarterly estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties, and working with qualified tax professionals to ensure accurate return preparation. Understanding that you are operating a business with all the attendant tax obligations, rather than simply pursuing a hobby, is essential for proper compliance. An attorney can help you structure your activities appropriately and connect you with qualified tax professionals who understand the unique aspects of content creation income.

Cryptocurrency users should similarly establish systems for tracking transactions, calculating basis, and determining gains or losses on each taxable event. Several software solutions are available to help track cryptocurrency transactions across multiple platforms and calculate tax obligations, though these tools are only as good as the data you provide them. Maintaining detailed records of when you acquired cryptocurrency, what you paid for it, and the fair market value at the time of each transaction is essential for accurate tax reporting. If you have engaged in cryptocurrency transactions without maintaining adequate records, working with professionals who can help reconstruct your transaction history may be necessary. While this process can be time-consuming and expensive, it is far preferable to facing criminal prosecution for unreported gains.

Moving Forward With Confidence

Understanding your tax obligations in the digital economy is the first step toward compliance and peace of mind. The federal government’s increased focus on digital income means that content creators and cryptocurrency users can no longer assume their activities will escape scrutiny. However, with proper planning, accurate record-keeping, and timely compliance, you can pursue these income opportunities while meeting your legal obligations. If you have made mistakes in the past, remember that options exist for correcting errors and resolving issues before they escalate to criminal prosecution. The key is taking action promptly and working with experienced professionals who can guide you through the process.

The cases discussed in this article demonstrate that federal authorities are committed to enforcing tax compliance in the digital economy with the same vigor they apply to traditional income sources. Whether you are a content creator earning income through subscription platforms, a cryptocurrency trader navigating complex reporting requirements, or someone who has made errors in past tax filings, understanding your rights and options is essential. The legal landscape surrounding digital income continues to evolve as platforms develop and regulations adapt to new technologies. Staying informed about your obligations and seeking professional guidance when questions arise can help you avoid the serious consequences that result from non-compliance.

If you find yourself facing questions about your tax compliance related to digital income, or if you have been contacted by federal investigators, do not attempt to navigate this situation alone. The complexity of tax law, combined with the serious criminal exposure these cases can create, makes experienced legal representation essential. An attorney who understands the technical aspects of digital income taxation and has experience defending federal tax cases can provide the guidance and advocacy you need to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome. Taking action early, before issues escalate, provides the greatest opportunity for favorable resolution and allows you to move forward with confidence in your compliance.

The digital economy offers tremendous opportunities for income generation, but it also creates responsibilities that cannot be ignored. By understanding your tax obligations, maintaining accurate records, and seeking professional guidance when needed, you can pursue these opportunities while protecting yourself from the serious consequences of non-compliance. Whether you need assistance establishing proper systems for ongoing compliance or addressing past errors, experienced legal counsel can provide the support and representation necessary to navigate these complex issues successfully. Your financial future and personal freedom are too important to leave to chance—take the steps necessary to ensure your compliance and protect everything you have worked to build.

Need an Attorney? CALL NOW: 213-932-8922

Yuliya Kelmansky is an Expert Attorney who has over 10 years of practice defending a variety of cases.

Reputation is Everything

  • five-star reviewVery well, spoken, organized, reaches deep into the facts, sensitive to a clients needs and is not shaken by her opposition. Knows how to stand up for her client. I would go to battle with her any day as co-counsel.- Charles F.

  • five-star reviewI had a case where a friend accused me of things I did not do. The accusations were untrue but I was charged. Within a couple weeks my case was dropped. Very thankful to Yuliya! Recommend.- Alexander M.

  • five-star reviewJulia is a great and attentive attorney. We needed to expunge my husband’s DUI case that took place 15 years ago and Julia helped us to get it done within no time. Highly recommend her services to anyone who is looking for a criminal law attorney!- Karina S.

  • five-star reviewI’m so grateful for the services that were provided by Yuliya. Her experience, kindness, and thoroughness during this difficult time went above and beyond. Yuliya was there for every court date and explained to me every step. I highly recommend her.- Alexandr S.

Free Consultation

    Contact Us Form